How to train your neural ODE: the world of Jacobian and kinetic regularization
About
Training neural ODEs on large datasets has not been tractable due to the necessity of allowing the adaptive numerical ODE solver to refine its step size to very small values. In practice this leads to dynamics equivalent to many hundreds or even thousands of layers. In this paper, we overcome this apparent difficulty by introducing a theoretically-grounded combination of both optimal transport and stability regularizations which encourage neural ODEs to prefer simpler dynamics out of all the dynamics that solve a problem well. Simpler dynamics lead to faster convergence and to fewer discretizations of the solver, considerably decreasing wall-clock time without loss in performance. Our approach allows us to train neural ODE-based generative models to the same performance as the unregularized dynamics, with significant reductions in training time. This brings neural ODEs closer to practical relevance in large-scale applications.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density Estimation | CIFAR-10 (test) | Bits/dim3.38 | 134 | |
| Density Estimation | ImageNet 32x32 (test) | Bits per Sub-pixel2.36 | 66 | |
| Density Estimation | ImageNet 64x64 (test) | Bits Per Sub-Pixel3.83 | 62 | |
| Generative Modeling | CIFAR-10 | BPD3.38 | 46 | |
| Unconditional Image Generation | CIFAR10 | BPD3.38 | 33 | |
| Unconditional Image Generation | ImageNet-32 | BPD3.36 | 31 | |
| Unconditional Image Generation | ImageNet 64 | BPD3.83 | 22 | |
| Intermediate distribution restoration | Single-cell data (intermediate time points ti for i in {1, 2, 3}) | W1 Score0.825 | 15 | |
| Generative Modeling | ImageNet 64x64 downsampled | Bits Per Dimension3.83 | 13 | |
| Image Modeling | ImageNet 64x64 (val) | NLL (bits/dim)3.83 | 11 |