Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognition

About

Deep neural networks can generate images that are astonishingly realistic, so much so that it is often hard for humans to distinguish them from actual photos. These achievements have been largely made possible by Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). While deep fake images have been thoroughly investigated in the image domain - a classical approach from the area of image forensics - an analysis in the frequency domain has been missing so far. In this paper, we address this shortcoming and our results reveal that in frequency space, GAN-generated images exhibit severe artifacts that can be easily identified. We perform a comprehensive analysis, showing that these artifacts are consistent across different neural network architectures, data sets, and resolutions. In a further investigation, we demonstrate that these artifacts are caused by upsampling operations found in all current GAN architectures, indicating a structural and fundamental problem in the way images are generated via GANs. Based on this analysis, we demonstrate how the frequency representation can be used to identify deep fake images in an automated way, surpassing state-of-the-art methods.

Joel Frank, Thorsten Eisenhofer, Lea Sch\"onherr, Asja Fischer, Dorothea Kolossa, Thorsten Holz• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Generated Image DetectionGenImage (test)
Average Accuracy70.42
124
AI-generated image detectionChameleon
Accuracy57.9
107
AI-generated image detectionChameleon (test)
Accuracy56.86
74
AI Image DetectionMidjourney
Accuracy45.9
51
AIGC DetectionAIGCDetectBenchmark
Accuracy67.45
50
Generated Image DetectionWukong
Accuracy40.3
41
AI-generated image detectionSD v1.5
Accuracy39.21
36
AI-generated image detectionProGAN
mAP100
29
AI-generated image detectionBigGAN
mAP93.62
29
AI-generated image detectionGauGAN
mAP82.84
29
Showing 10 of 82 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update