Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

RobustScanner: Dynamically Enhancing Positional Clues for Robust Text Recognition

About

The attention-based encoder-decoder framework has recently achieved impressive results for scene text recognition, and many variants have emerged with improvements in recognition quality. However, it performs poorly on contextless texts (e.g., random character sequences) which is unacceptable in most of real application scenarios. In this paper, we first deeply investigate the decoding process of the decoder. We empirically find that a representative character-level sequence decoder utilizes not only context information but also positional information. Contextual information, which the existing approaches heavily rely on, causes the problem of attention drift. To suppress such side-effect, we propose a novel position enhancement branch, and dynamically fuse its outputs with those of the decoder attention module for scene text recognition. Specifically, it contains a position aware module to enable the encoder to output feature vectors encoding their own spatial positions, and an attention module to estimate glimpses using the positional clue (i.e., the current decoding time step) only. The dynamic fusion is conducted for more robust feature via an element-wise gate mechanism. Theoretically, our proposed method, dubbed \emph{RobustScanner}, decodes individual characters with dynamic ratio between context and positional clues, and utilizes more positional ones when the decoding sequences with scarce context, and thus is robust and practical. Empirically, it has achieved new state-of-the-art results on popular regular and irregular text recognition benchmarks while without much performance drop on contextless benchmarks, validating its robustness in both contextual and contextless application scenarios.

Xiaoyu Yue, Zhanghui Kuang, Chenhao Lin, Hongbin Sun, Wayne Zhang• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Scene Text RecognitionSVT (test)
Word Accuracy89.3
289
Scene Text RecognitionIIIT5K (test)
Word Accuracy95.4
244
Scene Text RecognitionIC15 (test)
Word Accuracy79.2
210
Scene Text RecognitionIC13 (test)
Word Accuracy94.8
207
Scene Text RecognitionSVTP (test)
Word Accuracy82.9
153
Scene Text RecognitionIC13, IC15, IIIT, SVT, SVTP, CUTE80 Average of 6 benchmarks (test)
Average Accuracy87.52
105
Scene Text RecognitionSVT 647 (test)
Accuracy89.3
101
Scene Text RecognitionCUTE 288 samples (test)
Word Accuracy92.4
98
Scene Text RecognitionCUTE
Accuracy90.3
92
Scene Text RecognitionCUTE80 (test)
Accuracy0.924
87
Showing 10 of 39 rows

Other info

Follow for update