Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Norm-in-Norm Loss with Faster Convergence and Better Performance for Image Quality Assessment

About

Currently, most image quality assessment (IQA) models are supervised by the MAE or MSE loss with empirically slow convergence. It is well-known that normalization can facilitate fast convergence. Therefore, we explore normalization in the design of loss functions for IQA. Specifically, we first normalize the predicted quality scores and the corresponding subjective quality scores. Then, the loss is defined based on the norm of the differences between these normalized values. The resulting "Norm-in-Norm'' loss encourages the IQA model to make linear predictions with respect to subjective quality scores. After training, the least squares regression is applied to determine the linear mapping from the predicted quality to the subjective quality. It is shown that the new loss is closely connected with two common IQA performance criteria (PLCC and RMSE). Through theoretical analysis, it is proved that the embedded normalization makes the gradients of the loss function more stable and more predictable, which is conducive to the faster convergence of the IQA model. Furthermore, to experimentally verify the effectiveness of the proposed loss, it is applied to solve a challenging problem: quality assessment of in-the-wild images. Experiments on two relevant datasets (KonIQ-10k and CLIVE) show that, compared to MAE or MSE loss, the new loss enables the IQA model to converge about 10 times faster and the final model achieves better performance. The proposed model also achieves state-of-the-art prediction performance on this challenging problem. For reproducible scientific research, our code is publicly available at https://github.com/lidq92/LinearityIQA.

Dingquan Li, Tingting Jiang, Ming Jiang• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image Quality AssessmentAGIQA-3K
SRCC0.8189
175
Image Quality AssessmentKonIQ-10k (test)
SRCC0.938
91
Image Quality AssessmentAGIQA-1K
SRCC0.82
68
Visual Quality AssessmentAIGIQA-20K
SRCC0.7419
31
Authenticity score predictionAIGCIQA 2023
SRCC79.47
25
Authenticity score predictionPKU-AIGIQA-4K
SRCC0.6493
22
Image Quality AssessmentCLIVE (whole)
SROCC0.836
9
Image Quality AssessmentAIGCIQA 2023 (random seed 2)
SRCC0.7927
9
Image Quality AssessmentPKU-AIGIQA-4K (random seed 2)
SRCC66.33
9
Image Quality AssessmentAIGCIQA 2023 (random splits)
SRCC0.7974
9
Showing 10 of 21 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update