Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Semi-supervised semantic segmentation needs strong, varied perturbations

About

Consistency regularization describes a class of approaches that have yielded ground breaking results in semi-supervised classification problems. Prior work has established the cluster assumption - under which the data distribution consists of uniform class clusters of samples separated by low density regions - as important to its success. We analyze the problem of semantic segmentation and find that its' distribution does not exhibit low density regions separating classes and offer this as an explanation for why semi-supervised segmentation is a challenging problem, with only a few reports of success. We then identify choice of augmentation as key to obtaining reliable performance without such low-density regions. We find that adapted variants of the recently proposed CutOut and CutMix augmentation techniques yield state-of-the-art semi-supervised semantic segmentation results in standard datasets. Furthermore, given its challenging nature we propose that semantic segmentation acts as an effective acid test for evaluating semi-supervised regularizers. Implementation at: https://github.com/Britefury/cutmix-semisup-seg.

Geoff French, Samuli Laine, Timo Aila, Michal Mackiewicz, Graham Finlayson• 2019

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Semantic segmentationADE20K (val)
mIoU42.16
2731
Semantic segmentationPASCAL VOC 2012 (val)
Mean IoU78.21
2040
Semantic segmentationCityscapes (val)
mIoU67.68
572
Semantic segmentationGTA5 → Cityscapes (val)
mIoU64.8
533
Semantic segmentationPASCAL VOC (val)
mIoU72.5
338
Semantic segmentationCityscapes (val)
mIoU78.95
332
Semantic segmentationCityscapes (val)
mIoU78.25
287
Semantic segmentationPASCAL VOC 2012
mIoU73.9
187
Semantic segmentationPascal VOC augmented 2012 (val)
mIoU78.21
162
Semantic segmentationPASCAL VOC classic 2012 (val)
mIoU76.54
143
Showing 10 of 44 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update