Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Contextual Diversity for Active Learning

About

Requirement of large annotated datasets restrict the use of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for many practical applications. The problem can be mitigated by using active learning (AL) techniques which, under a given annotation budget, allow to select a subset of data that yields maximum accuracy upon fine tuning. State of the art AL approaches typically rely on measures of visual diversity or prediction uncertainty, which are unable to effectively capture the variations in spatial context. On the other hand, modern CNN architectures make heavy use of spatial context for achieving highly accurate predictions. Since the context is difficult to evaluate in the absence of ground-truth labels, we introduce the notion of contextual diversity that captures the confusion associated with spatially co-occurring classes. Contextual Diversity (CD) hinges on a crucial observation that the probability vector predicted by a CNN for a region of interest typically contains information from a larger receptive field. Exploiting this observation, we use the proposed CD measure within two AL frameworks: (1) a core-set based strategy and (2) a reinforcement learning based policy, for active frame selection. Our extensive empirical evaluation establish state of the art results for active learning on benchmark datasets of Semantic Segmentation, Object Detection and Image Classification. Our ablation studies show clear advantages of using contextual diversity for active learning. The source code and additional results are available at https://github.com/sharat29ag/CDAL.

Sharat Agarwal, Himanshu Arora, Saket Anand, Chetan Arora• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Graph ClassificationMUTAG
Accuracy88.1
697
3D Object DetectionScanNet V2 (val)
mAP@0.2557.99
352
Graph Classificationogbg-molpcba (test)
AP27.8
206
Traffic ForecastingPeMS08
RMSE28.1
166
3D Object DetectionSUN RGB-D (val)
mAP@0.2550.86
158
Spatio-temporal forecastingPEMS08 (test)
MAPE11.83
96
Graph ClassificationOGBG-MOLHIV v1 (test)
ROC-AUC0.767
88
Graph ClassificationDHFR
Accuracy76.1
80
Graph ClassificationOGBG-MOLPCBA v1 (test)
AP26.4
77
Spatio-temporal forecastingUrbanEV (test)
MAPE30.4
73
Showing 10 of 16 rows

Other info

Follow for update