Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Synthesize then Compare: Detecting Failures and Anomalies for Semantic Segmentation

About

The ability to detect failures and anomalies are fundamental requirements for building reliable systems for computer vision applications, especially safety-critical applications of semantic segmentation, such as autonomous driving and medical image analysis. In this paper, we systematically study failure and anomaly detection for semantic segmentation and propose a unified framework, consisting of two modules, to address these two related problems. The first module is an image synthesis module, which generates a synthesized image from a segmentation layout map, and the second is a comparison module, which computes the difference between the synthesized image and the input image. We validate our framework on three challenging datasets and improve the state-of-the-arts by large margins, \emph{i.e.}, 6% AUPR-Error on Cityscapes, 7% Pearson correlation on pancreatic tumor segmentation in MSD and 20% AUPR on StreetHazards anomaly segmentation.

Yingda Xia, Yi Zhang, Fengze Liu, Wei Shen, Alan Yuille• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Anomaly SegmentationFishyscapes Lost & Found (test)
FPR@9545.95
61
Anomaly SegmentationFishyscapes Lost & Found (val)
FPR9545.95
53
Anomaly SegmentationRoad Anomaly (test)
FPR9564.69
47
Anomaly SegmentationFishyscapes Static (val)
FPR950.3402
43
Anomaly DetectionFishyscapes Lost & Found (val)
AP6.54
21
Anomaly DetectionFishyscapes Static (val)
AUROC89.9
20
Anomaly DetectionStreetHazards
AP9.3
18
Anomaly DetectionStreetHazards (test)
AP9.3
15
Anomaly SegmentationStreetHazards (test)
FPR9528.4
13
Pixel-level failure detectionCityscapes (val)
AP-Err55.53
12
Showing 10 of 24 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update