Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanations
About
Counterfactual explanations are one of the most popular methods to make predictions of black box machine learning models interpretable by providing explanations in the form of `what-if scenarios'. Most current approaches optimize a collapsed, weighted sum of multiple objectives, which are naturally difficult to balance a-priori. We propose the Multi-Objective Counterfactuals (MOC) method, which translates the counterfactual search into a multi-objective optimization problem. Our approach not only returns a diverse set of counterfactuals with different trade-offs between the proposed objectives, but also maintains diversity in feature space. This enables a more detailed post-hoc analysis to facilitate better understanding and also more options for actionable user responses to change the predicted outcome. Our approach is also model-agnostic and works for numerical and categorical input features. We show the usefulness of MOC in concrete cases and compare our approach with state-of-the-art methods for counterfactual explanations.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Counterfactual Explanation Generation | Digits | -- | 17 | |
| Counterfactual Explanation | Wine | Phi3.678 | 6 | |
| Counterfactual Explanation | Breast cancer | Phi7.236 | 6 | |
| Counterfactual Explanation | Wine Quality Red | Phi Score24.674 | 6 | |
| Counterfactual Explanation | phoneme | Phi Score21.626 | 6 | |
| Counterfactual Explanation | coil 2000 | Phi33.06 | 6 | |
| Counterfactual Explanation | Iris | Phi Score0.25 | 6 |