Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptation

About

Today's state-of-the-art machine vision models are vulnerable to image corruptions like blurring or compression artefacts, limiting their performance in many real-world applications. We here argue that popular benchmarks to measure model robustness against common corruptions (like ImageNet-C) underestimate model robustness in many (but not all) application scenarios. The key insight is that in many scenarios, multiple unlabeled examples of the corruptions are available and can be used for unsupervised online adaptation. Replacing the activation statistics estimated by batch normalization on the training set with the statistics of the corrupted images consistently improves the robustness across 25 different popular computer vision models. Using the corrected statistics, ResNet-50 reaches 62.2% mCE on ImageNet-C compared to 76.7% without adaptation. With the more robust DeepAugment+AugMix model, we improve the state of the art achieved by a ResNet50 model up to date from 53.6% mCE to 45.4% mCE. Even adapting to a single sample improves robustness for the ResNet-50 and AugMix models, and 32 samples are sufficient to improve the current state of the art for a ResNet-50 architecture. We argue that results with adapted statistics should be included whenever reporting scores in corruption benchmarks and other out-of-distribution generalization settings.

Steffen Schneider, Evgenia Rusak, Luisa Eck, Oliver Bringmann, Wieland Brendel, Matthias Bethge• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationPACS (test)--
254
Image ClassificationPACS
Overall Average Accuracy75.35
230
Image ClassificationDomainNet (test)
Average Accuracy43.38
209
Image ClassificationOffice-Home (test)
Mean Accuracy66.1
199
Image ClassificationOfficeHome
Average Accuracy66.1
131
Image ClassificationImageNet-C (test)
mCE (Mean Corruption Error)62.2
110
Image ClassificationImageNet-R (test)--
105
Image ClassificationPACS
Accuracy85.03
100
Digit ClassificationMNIST (test)
Error Rate39.6
94
Image ClassificationVLCS
Accuracy64.78
76
Showing 10 of 87 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update