Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Distribution Matching for Crowd Counting

About

In crowd counting, each training image contains multiple people, where each person is annotated by a dot. Existing crowd counting methods need to use a Gaussian to smooth each annotated dot or to estimate the likelihood of every pixel given the annotated point. In this paper, we show that imposing Gaussians to annotations hurts generalization performance. Instead, we propose to use Distribution Matching for crowd COUNTing (DM-Count). In DM-Count, we use Optimal Transport (OT) to measure the similarity between the normalized predicted density map and the normalized ground truth density map. To stabilize OT computation, we include a Total Variation loss in our model. We show that the generalization error bound of DM-Count is tighter than that of the Gaussian smoothed methods. In terms of Mean Absolute Error, DM-Count outperforms the previous state-of-the-art methods by a large margin on two large-scale counting datasets, UCF-QNRF and NWPU, and achieves the state-of-the-art results on the ShanghaiTech and UCF-CC50 datasets. DM-Count reduced the error of the state-of-the-art published result by approximately 16%. Code is available at https://github.com/cvlab-stonybrook/DM-Count.

Boyu Wang, Huidong Liu, Dimitris Samaras, Minh Hoai• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Crowd CountingShanghaiTech Part A (test)
MAE59.7
271
Crowd CountingShanghaiTech Part B (test)
MAE7.4
208
Crowd CountingShanghaiTech Part B
MAE7.4
177
Crowd CountingShanghaiTech Part A
MAE59.7
155
Crowd CountingUCF-QNRF (test)
MAE85.6
113
Crowd CountingUCF_CC_50 (test)
MAE161
66
Crowd CountingUCF_CC_50
MAE211
60
Crowd CountingJHU-CROWD++ (test)
MAE66
57
Crowd CountingUCF-QNRF
MAE85.6
46
Crowd CountingUCF-QNRF (Q) (test)
MAE134.4
31
Showing 10 of 27 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update