Differentiable Causal Discovery from Interventional Data
About
Learning a causal directed acyclic graph from data is a challenging task that involves solving a combinatorial problem for which the solution is not always identifiable. A new line of work reformulates this problem as a continuous constrained optimization one, which is solved via the augmented Lagrangian method. However, most methods based on this idea do not make use of interventional data, which can significantly alleviate identifiability issues. This work constitutes a new step in this direction by proposing a theoretically-grounded method based on neural networks that can leverage interventional data. We illustrate the flexibility of the continuous-constrained framework by taking advantage of expressive neural architectures such as normalizing flows. We show that our approach compares favorably to the state of the art in a variety of settings, including perfect and imperfect interventions for which the targeted nodes may even be unknown.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crash Avoidance | Crash Spuriousness S (test) | Success Rate53.4 | 10 | |
| Object Stacking | Stack Spuriousness S (test) | Success Rate90.5 | 10 | |
| Box/Door Unlocking | Unlock Spuriousness S (test) | Success Rate23.1 | 10 | |
| Box/Door Unlocking | Unlock Composition C (test) | Success Rate3.62e+3 | 10 | |
| Object Stacking | Stack Composition C (test) | Success Rate73.9 | 10 | |
| Box/Door Unlocking | Unlock In-distribution I (test) | Success Rate4.49e+3 | 10 | |
| Crash Avoidance | Crash In-distribution I (test) | Success Rate42.3 | 10 | |
| Object Stacking | Stack In-distribution I (test) | Success Rate92.7 | 10 | |
| Crash Avoidance | Crash Composition C (test) | Success Rate8.4 | 10 | |
| Causal Discovery | Chemistry environment Jungle (ID) | Success Rate6.30e+3 | 9 |