Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural Network
About
Despite recent progress in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), explaining predictions made by GNNs remains a challenging open problem. The leading method independently addresses the local explanations (i.e., important subgraph structure and node features) to interpret why a GNN model makes the prediction for a single instance, e.g. a node or a graph. As a result, the explanation generated is painstakingly customized for each instance. The unique explanation interpreting each instance independently is not sufficient to provide a global understanding of the learned GNN model, leading to a lack of generalizability and hindering it from being used in the inductive setting. Besides, as it is designed for explaining a single instance, it is challenging to explain a set of instances naturally (e.g., graphs of a given class). In this study, we address these key challenges and propose PGExplainer, a parameterized explainer for GNNs. PGExplainer adopts a deep neural network to parameterize the generation process of explanations, which enables PGExplainer a natural approach to explaining multiple instances collectively. Compared to the existing work, PGExplainer has better generalization ability and can be utilized in an inductive setting easily. Experiments on both synthetic and real-life datasets show highly competitive performance with up to 24.7\% relative improvement in AUC on explaining graph classification over the leading baseline.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graph Explanation | MUTAG | Explanation Accuracy74.7 | 20 | |
| Graph Explanation | TREE-CYCLES | Explanation Accuracy97.1 | 20 | |
| Graph Explanation | NCI1 | Explanation Accuracy71 | 20 | |
| Graph Explanation | BA-SHAPES | Explanation Accuracy64.3 | 20 | |
| Counterfactual Explanations | Loan-Decision | Misclassification Rate10 | 19 | |
| Graph Explanation | ZINC250K HLM-CLint (test) | Fidelity+0.692 | 13 | |
| Counterfactual Explanation | Ogbn-arxiv | Misclassification Rate26 | 10 | |
| Performance of counterfactual explanations | TREE-CYCLES | Misclass Rate41 | 10 | |
| Counterfactual Explanation | Aggregate of six datasets (including Cora) | Misclassification Rank (Avg)8.2 | 10 | |
| Structural Explanation | Tree-Cycle | Precision99.25 | 9 |