Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Ranking

About

Not all data in a typical training set help with generalization; some samples can be overly ambiguous or outrightly mislabeled. This paper introduces a new method to identify such samples and mitigate their impact when training neural networks. At the heart of our algorithm is the Area Under the Margin (AUM) statistic, which exploits differences in the training dynamics of clean and mislabeled samples. A simple procedure - adding an extra class populated with purposefully mislabeled threshold samples - learns a AUM upper bound that isolates mislabeled data. This approach consistently improves upon prior work on synthetic and real-world datasets. On the WebVision50 classification task our method removes 17% of training data, yielding a 1.6% (absolute) improvement in test error. On CIFAR100 removing 13% of the data leads to a 1.2% drop in error.

Geoff Pleiss, Tianyi Zhang, Ethan R. Elenberg, Kilian Q. Weinberger• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)
Accuracy77.35
3518
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 (test)
Accuracy95.44
3381
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10
Accuracy58.34
564
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10
Accuracy49.51
508
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10
Accuracy95.26
507
Image ClassificationOrganSMNIST
Accuracy91.58
133
ClassificationOrganAMNIST
Accuracy98.55
125
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100
Accuracy16.64
117
ClassificationPneumoniaMNIST
Accuracy96.68
84
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 Symmetric Noise (test)
Accuracy59.29
76
Showing 10 of 25 rows

Other info

Follow for update