Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Ranking

About

Not all data in a typical training set help with generalization; some samples can be overly ambiguous or outrightly mislabeled. This paper introduces a new method to identify such samples and mitigate their impact when training neural networks. At the heart of our algorithm is the Area Under the Margin (AUM) statistic, which exploits differences in the training dynamics of clean and mislabeled samples. A simple procedure - adding an extra class populated with purposefully mislabeled threshold samples - learns a AUM upper bound that isolates mislabeled data. This approach consistently improves upon prior work on synthetic and real-world datasets. On the WebVision50 classification task our method removes 17% of training data, yielding a 1.6% (absolute) improvement in test error. On CIFAR100 removing 13% of the data leads to a 1.2% drop in error.

Geoff Pleiss, Tianyi Zhang, Ethan R. Elenberg, Kilian Q. Weinberger• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)
Accuracy77.35
3518
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 (test)
Accuracy95.44
3381
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10
Accuracy95.26
507
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10
Accuracy58.34
471
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 Symmetric Noise (test)
Accuracy59.29
76
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 Symmetric Noise (test)
Test Accuracy (Overall)91.52
64
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 standard (test)
Accuracy55.84
60
LF Mislabeling IdentificationIMDB
AP30.1
38
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 Asymmetric Noise (test)--
33
Image ClassificationImageNet-1K standard (val test)
Top-1 Accuracy39.34
21
Showing 10 of 19 rows

Other info

Follow for update