Event Extraction by Answering (Almost) Natural Questions
About
The problem of event extraction requires detecting the event trigger and extracting its corresponding arguments. Existing work in event argument extraction typically relies heavily on entity recognition as a preprocessing/concurrent step, causing the well-known problem of error propagation. To avoid this issue, we introduce a new paradigm for event extraction by formulating it as a question answering (QA) task that extracts the event arguments in an end-to-end manner. Empirical results demonstrate that our framework outperforms prior methods substantially; in addition, it is capable of extracting event arguments for roles not seen at training time (zero-shot learning setting).
Xinya Du, Claire Cardie• 2020
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argument Classification | ACE05-E (test) | F1 Score53.3 | 63 | |
| Event Classification | OntoEvent (test) | F1 Score62.04 | 35 | |
| Event Detection | ACE 2005 | F1 Score72.4 | 27 | |
| Argument Classification | WikiEvents (test) | Head F159.3 | 23 | |
| Event Argument Extraction | ACE05-E (test) | Arg-C Score65.4 | 20 | |
| Argument Identification | WikiEvents (test) | Head F161.05 | 20 | |
| Event Argument Extraction | WikiEvents (test) | Arg-C54.5 | 15 | |
| Event extraction | ACE (test) | Practical EM38.51 | 14 | |
| Event Argument Extraction | RAMS | Arg-C46.7 | 14 | |
| Event Detection | ACE05 2-shot (test) | F1 Score24.1 | 13 |
Showing 10 of 22 rows