Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Disentangling Label Distribution for Long-tailed Visual Recognition

About

The current evaluation protocol of long-tailed visual recognition trains the classification model on the long-tailed source label distribution and evaluates its performance on the uniform target label distribution. Such protocol has questionable practicality since the target may also be long-tailed. Therefore, we formulate long-tailed visual recognition as a label shift problem where the target and source label distributions are different. One of the significant hurdles in dealing with the label shift problem is the entanglement between the source label distribution and the model prediction. In this paper, we focus on disentangling the source label distribution from the model prediction. We first introduce a simple but overlooked baseline method that matches the target label distribution by post-processing the model prediction trained by the cross-entropy loss and the Softmax function. Although this method surpasses state-of-the-art methods on benchmark datasets, it can be further improved by directly disentangling the source label distribution from the model prediction in the training phase. Thus, we propose a novel method, LAbel distribution DisEntangling (LADE) loss based on the optimal bound of Donsker-Varadhan representation. LADE achieves state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets such as CIFAR-100-LT, Places-LT, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturalist 2018. Moreover, LADE outperforms existing methods on various shifted target label distributions, showing the general adaptability of our proposed method.

Youngkyu Hong, Seungju Han, Kwanghee Choi, Seokjun Seo, Beomsu Kim, Buru Chang• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationImageNet LT
Top-1 Accuracy53
251
Long-Tailed Image ClassificationImageNet-LT (test)
Top-1 Acc (Overall)53
220
Image ClassificationiNaturalist 2018 (test)
Top-1 Accuracy70
192
Image ClassificationImageNet-LT (test)
Top-1 Acc (All)53
159
Image ClassificationPlaces-LT (test)
Accuracy (Medium)39.1
128
Image ClassificationiNaturalist 2018 (val)--
116
Node ClassificationCora (semi-supervised)--
103
Long-tailed Visual RecognitionImageNet LT
Overall Accuracy51.9
89
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100-LT Imbalance Ratio 100
Top-1 Acc0.454
88
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100-LT Imbalance Ratio 10
Top-1 Acc61.7
83
Showing 10 of 80 rows
...

Other info

Code

Follow for update