Neural Spatio-Temporal Point Processes
About
We propose a new class of parameterizations for spatio-temporal point processes which leverage Neural ODEs as a computational method and enable flexible, high-fidelity models of discrete events that are localized in continuous time and space. Central to our approach is a combination of continuous-time neural networks with two novel neural architectures, i.e., Jump and Attentive Continuous-time Normalizing Flows. This approach allows us to learn complex distributions for both the spatial and temporal domain and to condition non-trivially on the observed event history. We validate our models on data sets from a wide variety of contexts such as seismology, epidemiology, urban mobility, and neuroscience.
Ricky T. Q. Chen, Brandon Amos, Maximilian Nickel• 2020
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spatio-temporal event modeling | NYC Vehicle Collisions | TLL396.3 | 12 | |
| Spatio-temporal event modeling | NYC Complaint Data | TLL3.07 | 12 | |
| Spatio-temporal event modeling | Crimes in Vancouver | TLL65.45 | 12 | |
| Next-event time and location prediction | COVID-19 | Temporal Error (RMSE)0.145 | 10 | |
| Next-event time and location prediction | Citibike | Temporal RMSE0.355 | 10 | |
| Next-event time and location prediction | Earthquake | Temporal RMSE0.547 | 10 | |
| Spatio-temporal Density Estimation | Earthquake (EQ) (test) | NLL1.668 | 10 | |
| Marginal intensity recovery | Syn1 | Relative L2 Error5.57 | 6 | |
| Marginal intensity recovery | Syn2 | Relative L2 Error2.99 | 6 | |
| Spatio-temporal Density Estimation | Bikes (test) | NLL2.315 | 4 |
Showing 10 of 19 rows