Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Ranked List Loss for Deep Metric Learning

About

The objective of deep metric learning (DML) is to learn embeddings that can capture semantic similarity and dissimilarity information among data points. Existing pairwise or tripletwise loss functions used in DML are known to suffer from slow convergence due to a large proportion of trivial pairs or triplets as the model improves. To improve this, ranking-motivated structured losses are proposed recently to incorporate multiple examples and exploit the structured information among them. They converge faster and achieve state-of-the-art performance. In this work, we unveil two limitations of existing ranking-motivated structured losses and propose a novel ranked list loss to solve both of them. First, given a query, only a fraction of data points is incorporated to build the similarity structure. Consequently, some useful examples are ignored and the structure is less informative. To address this, we propose to build a set-based similarity structure by exploiting all instances in the gallery. The learning setting can be interpreted as few-shot retrieval: given a mini-batch, every example is iteratively used as a query, and the rest ones compose the gallery to search, i.e., the support set in few-shot setting. The rest examples are split into a positive set and a negative set. For every mini-batch, the learning objective of ranked list loss is to make the query closer to the positive set than to the negative set by a margin. Second, previous methods aim to pull positive pairs as close as possible in the embedding space. As a result, the intraclass data distribution tends to be extremely compressed. In contrast, we propose to learn a hypersphere for each class in order to preserve useful similarity structure inside it, which functions as regularisation. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of our proposal by comparing with the state-of-the-art methods.

Xinshao Wang, Yang Hua, Elyor Kodirov, Neil M. Robertson• 2019

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image RetrievalCUB-200-2011 (test)
Recall@157.4
251
Image RetrievalStanford Online Products (test)
Recall@176.1
220
Image RetrievalCUB-200 2011
Recall@161.3
146
Image RetrievalCARS196 (test)
Recall@182.1
134
Deep Metric LearningCUB200 2011 (test)
Recall@161.3
129
Image RetrievalCARS196
Recall@182.1
56
Deep Metric LearningCARS196 (test)
R@182.1
56
Deep Metric LearningCARS196
Recall@182.1
50
Image RetrievalStanford Online Products
Recall@179.8
49
Deep Metric LearningSOP (test)
Recall@179.8
32
Showing 10 of 16 rows

Other info

Follow for update