PointNetLK Revisited
About
We address the generalization ability of recent learning-based point cloud registration methods. Despite their success, these approaches tend to have poor performance when applied to mismatched conditions that are not well-represented in the training set, such as unseen object categories, different complex scenes, or unknown depth sensors. In these circumstances, it has often been better to rely on classical non-learning methods (e.g., Iterative Closest Point), which have better generalization ability. Hybrid learning methods, that use learning for predicting point correspondences and then a deterministic step for alignment, have offered some respite, but are still limited in their generalization abilities. We revisit a recent innovation -- PointNetLK -- and show that the inclusion of an analytical Jacobian can exhibit remarkable generalization properties while reaping the inherent fidelity benefits of a learning framework. Our approach not only outperforms the state-of-the-art in mismatched conditions but also produces results competitive with current learning methods when operating on real-world test data close to the training set.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pairwise point cloud registration | Stanford Bunny noiseless | Translation Error (m)1.68 | 7 | |
| Pairwise point cloud registration | Stanford Buddha (noiseless) | Translation Error (m)1 | 7 | |
| Point cloud registration | Bunny Noisy (synthetic) | Translation Error (m)1.01 | 7 | |
| Pairwise point cloud registration | Stanford Armadillo noiseless | Translation Error (m)3.68 | 7 | |
| Point cloud registration | Dragon Noisy (synthetic) | Translation Error (m)1.23 | 7 | |
| Pairwise point cloud registration | Stanford Dragon (noiseless) | Translation Error (m)3.91 | 7 | |
| Point cloud registration | Buddha Noisy (synthetic) | Translation Error (m)9.2 | 7 | |
| Point cloud registration | Armadillo Noisy (synthetic) | Translation Error (m)7.32 | 7 |