Rethinking Perturbations in Encoder-Decoders for Fast Training
About
We often use perturbations to regularize neural models. For neural encoder-decoders, previous studies applied the scheduled sampling (Bengio et al., 2015) and adversarial perturbations (Sato et al., 2019) as perturbations but these methods require considerable computational time. Thus, this study addresses the question of whether these approaches are efficient enough for training time. We compare several perturbations in sequence-to-sequence problems with respect to computational time. Experimental results show that the simple techniques such as word dropout (Gal and Ghahramani, 2016) and random replacement of input tokens achieve comparable (or better) scores to the recently proposed perturbations, even though these simple methods are faster. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/takase/rethink_perturbations.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grammatical Error Correction | CoNLL 2014 (test) | F0.5 Score62.33 | 207 | |
| Grammatical Error Correction | BEA shared task 2019 (test) | F0.5 Score65.97 | 139 | |
| Text Summarization | DUC 2004 (test) | ROUGE-133.06 | 115 | |
| Machine Translation | newstest 2010-2016 (test) | BLEU27.57 | 32 | |
| Machine Translation | WMT En-De 2016 | BLEU37.96 | 26 | |
| Text Summarization | Annotated English Gigaword standard (test) | ROUGE-139.81 | 15 | |
| Machine Translation | newstest 2010 | BLEU24.92 | 14 | |
| Machine Translation | newstest Average 2010-2016 | BLEU27.57 | 14 | |
| Machine Translation | WMT En-De 2013 | BLEU28.72 | 13 | |
| Machine Translation | IWSLT German-English 2014 (tst2010-2012) | BLEU36.22 | 11 |