Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wild

About

Performance of blind image quality assessment (BIQA) models has been significantly boosted by end-to-end optimization of feature engineering and quality regression. Nevertheless, due to the distributional shift between images simulated in the laboratory and captured in the wild, models trained on databases with synthetic distortions remain particularly weak at handling realistic distortions (and vice versa). To confront the cross-distortion-scenario challenge, we develop a \textit{unified} BIQA model and an approach of training it for both synthetic and realistic distortions. We first sample pairs of images from individual IQA databases, and compute a probability that the first image of each pair is of higher quality. We then employ the fidelity loss to optimize a deep neural network for BIQA over a large number of such image pairs. We also explicitly enforce a hinge constraint to regularize uncertainty estimation during optimization. Extensive experiments on six IQA databases show the promise of the learned method in blindly assessing image quality in the laboratory and wild. In addition, we demonstrate the universality of the proposed training strategy by using it to improve existing BIQA models.

Weixia Zhang, Kede Ma, Guangtao Zhai, Xiaokang Yang• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image Quality AssessmentSPAQ
SRCC0.751
191
Image Quality AssessmentTID 2013 (test)
Mean SRCC0.768
124
Image Quality AssessmentCSIQ (test)
SRCC0.902
103
Image Quality AssessmentPIPAL
SRCC0.393
95
Image Quality AssessmentKADID
SRCC0.513
95
Image Quality AssessmentKADID-10k (test)
SRCC0.884
91
Image Quality AssessmentKonIQ
SRCC0.649
82
Image Quality AssessmentSPAQ (test)
SRCC0.838
77
No-Reference Image Quality AssessmentKonIQ-10k
SROCC0.896
73
No-Reference Image Quality AssessmentCSIQ
SROCC0.902
73
Showing 10 of 35 rows

Other info

Follow for update