Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Semantic Image Matting

About

Natural image matting separates the foreground from background in fractional occupancy which can be caused by highly transparent objects, complex foreground (e.g., net or tree), and/or objects containing very fine details (e.g., hairs). Although conventional matting formulation can be applied to all of the above cases, no previous work has attempted to reason the underlying causes of matting due to various foreground semantics. We show how to obtain better alpha mattes by incorporating into our framework semantic classification of matting regions. Specifically, we consider and learn 20 classes of matting patterns, and propose to extend the conventional trimap to semantic trimap. The proposed semantic trimap can be obtained automatically through patch structure analysis within trimap regions. Meanwhile, we learn a multi-class discriminator to regularize the alpha prediction at semantic level, and content-sensitive weights to balance different regularization losses. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that our method outperforms other methods and has achieved the most competitive state-of-the-art performance. Finally, we contribute a large-scale Semantic Image Matting Dataset with careful consideration of data balancing across different semantic classes.

Yanan Sun, Chi-Keung Tang, Yu-Wing Tai• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image MattingComposition-1K (test)
SAD27.7
203
MattingDistinction-646 (test)
SAD22.68
45
MattingAIM-500 (test)
SAD27.05
28
Instance MattingHIM2K Natural
IMQmad54.43
16
Semantic Image MattingSemantic Image Matting Dataset (test)
SAD27.87
16
Instance MattingHIM2K Synthetic
IMQmad43.02
16
MattingSIMDour (test)
SAD37.07
14
Image MattingAIM-500
SAD27.05
14
Image MattingAdobe Composition-1K
SAD28
12
Instance MattingRWP636
IMQmad34.66
7
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update