Positive-Congruent Training: Towards Regression-Free Model Updates
About
Reducing inconsistencies in the behavior of different versions of an AI system can be as important in practice as reducing its overall error. In image classification, sample-wise inconsistencies appear as "negative flips": A new model incorrectly predicts the output for a test sample that was correctly classified by the old (reference) model. Positive-congruent (PC) training aims at reducing error rate while at the same time reducing negative flips, thus maximizing congruency with the reference model only on positive predictions, unlike model distillation. We propose a simple approach for PC training, Focal Distillation, which enforces congruence with the reference model by giving more weights to samples that were correctly classified. We also found that, if the reference model itself can be chosen as an ensemble of multiple deep neural networks, negative flips can be further reduced without affecting the new model's accuracy.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Language Understanding | GLUE (dev) | SST-2 (Acc)93.12 | 504 | |
| Dependency Parsing | Dependency Parsing | LCM Accuracy60.64 | 15 | |
| Dependency Parsing | Dependency Parsing deepbiaf → deepbiaf NeuroNLP2 implementation (unlabeled metrics) | UCM Accuracy67.21 | 10 | |
| Conversational Semantic Parsing | TOP s2s-base-part ⇒ s2s-base | EM Accuracy86.9 | 5 | |
| Conversational Semantic Parsing | TOP s2s-large-part ⇒ s2s-large | EM Accuracy87.65 | 5 | |
| Dependency Parsing | Dependency Parsing stackptr → stackptr unlabeled metrics NeuroNLP2 implementation | UCM Accuracy67.21 | 5 | |
| Conversational Semantic Parsing | TOP s2s-base ⇒ s2s-large | EM Accuracy87.65 | 5 |