Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Sponge Examples: Energy-Latency Attacks on Neural Networks

About

The high energy costs of neural network training and inference led to the use of acceleration hardware such as GPUs and TPUs. While this enabled us to train large-scale neural networks in datacenters and deploy them on edge devices, the focus so far is on average-case performance. In this work, we introduce a novel threat vector against neural networks whose energy consumption or decision latency are critical. We show how adversaries can exploit carefully crafted $\boldsymbol{sponge}~\boldsymbol{examples}$, which are inputs designed to maximise energy consumption and latency. We mount two variants of this attack on established vision and language models, increasing energy consumption by a factor of 10 to 200. Our attacks can also be used to delay decisions where a network has critical real-time performance, such as in perception for autonomous vehicles. We demonstrate the portability of our malicious inputs across CPUs and a variety of hardware accelerator chips including GPUs, and an ASIC simulator. We conclude by proposing a defense strategy which mitigates our attack by shifting the analysis of energy consumption in hardware from an average-case to a worst-case perspective.

Ilia Shumailov, Yiren Zhao, Daniel Bates, Nicolas Papernot, Robert Mullins, Ross Anderson• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationImageNet (val)
GFLOPS2.24
30
Image ClassificationImageNet
GFLOPS3.88
27
Inference Cost AttackAlpaca Llama2-7B (test)
Average Length457
6
Inference Cost AttackAlpaca Samantha-7B (test)
Average Length1.27e+3
6
Inference Cost AttackAlpaca Vicuna-7B (test)
Average Length84
6
Showing 5 of 5 rows

Other info

Follow for update