CLOCS: Contrastive Learning of Cardiac Signals Across Space, Time, and Patients
About
The healthcare industry generates troves of unlabelled physiological data. This data can be exploited via contrastive learning, a self-supervised pre-training method that encourages representations of instances to be similar to one another. We propose a family of contrastive learning methods, CLOCS, that encourages representations across space, time, \textit{and} patients to be similar to one another. We show that CLOCS consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art methods, BYOL and SimCLR, when performing a linear evaluation of, and fine-tuning on, downstream tasks. We also show that CLOCS achieves strong generalization performance with only 25\% of labelled training data. Furthermore, our training procedure naturally generates patient-specific representations that can be used to quantify patient-similarity.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECG Classification | PTBXL Super | Macro AUC76.3 | 84 | |
| ECG Classification | PTBXL Sub | -- | 18 | |
| ECG Classification | PTBXL Form | -- | 18 | |
| ECG Classification | PTBXL Rhythm | -- | 18 | |
| ECG Classification | CSN | -- | 18 | |
| ECG Classification | CPSC 2018 | Macro AUC (1%)59.59 | 17 | |
| ECG Classification | PTB-XL, CPSC2018, CSN Cross-domain (test) | AUC (PTBXL-Super -> CPSC2018)68.79 | 14 | |
| ECG Classification | Ningbo | Accuracy90.3 | 8 | |
| ECG Classification | PTB-XL | Accuracy72.4 | 8 | |
| ECG Classification | ICBEB 2018 | Accuracy73.6 | 8 |