Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Bridging Multi-Task Learning and Meta-Learning: Towards Efficient Training and Effective Adaptation

About

Multi-task learning (MTL) aims to improve the generalization of several related tasks by learning them jointly. As a comparison, in addition to the joint training scheme, modern meta-learning allows unseen tasks with limited labels during the test phase, in the hope of fast adaptation over them. Despite the subtle difference between MTL and meta-learning in the problem formulation, both learning paradigms share the same insight that the shared structure between existing training tasks could lead to better generalization and adaptation. In this paper, we take one important step further to understand the close connection between these two learning paradigms, through both theoretical analysis and empirical investigation. Theoretically, we first demonstrate that MTL shares the same optimization formulation with a class of gradient-based meta-learning (GBML) algorithms. We then prove that for over-parameterized neural networks with sufficient depth, the learned predictive functions of MTL and GBML are close. In particular, this result implies that the predictions given by these two models are similar over the same unseen task. Empirically, we corroborate our theoretical findings by showing that, with proper implementation, MTL is competitive against state-of-the-art GBML algorithms on a set of few-shot image classification benchmarks. Since existing GBML algorithms often involve costly second-order bi-level optimization, our first-order MTL method is an order of magnitude faster on large-scale datasets such as mini-ImageNet. We believe this work could help bridge the gap between these two learning paradigms, and provide a computationally efficient alternative to GBML that also supports fast task adaptation.

Haoxiang Wang, Han Zhao, Bo Li• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
5-way Image ClassificationtieredImageNet 5-way (test)
1-shot Acc67.11
117
5-way Few-shot Image ClassificationFC100 (test)
1-shot Accuracy42.4
78
5-way Few-shot Image ClassificationCIFAR FS (test)
1-shot Acc69.5
63
Image ClassificationminiImageNet 5-way 1-shot (meta-test)
Accuracy59.84
41
5-way Few-shot ClassificationminiImageNet 5-way (test)
1-shot Acc59.84
39
Multi-Domain ClassificationOffice-Home (test)--
20
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update