LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learning
About
This paper studies task adaptive pre-trained model selection, an underexplored problem of assessing pre-trained models for the target task and select best ones from the model zoo \emph{without fine-tuning}. A few pilot works addressed the problem in transferring supervised pre-trained models to classification tasks, but they cannot handle emerging unsupervised pre-trained models or regression tasks. In pursuit of a practical assessment method, we propose to estimate the maximum value of label evidence given features extracted by pre-trained models. Unlike the maximum likelihood, the maximum evidence is \emph{immune to over-fitting}, while its expensive computation can be dramatically reduced by our carefully designed algorithm. The Logarithm of Maximum Evidence (LogME) can be used to assess pre-trained models for transfer learning: a pre-trained model with a high LogME value is likely to have good transfer performance. LogME is \emph{fast, accurate, and general}, characterizing itself as the first practical method for assessing pre-trained models. Compared with brute-force fine-tuning, LogME brings at most $3000\times$ speedup in wall-clock time and requires only $1\%$ memory footprint. It outperforms prior methods by a large margin in their setting and is applicable to new settings. It is general enough for diverse pre-trained models (supervised pre-trained and unsupervised pre-trained), downstream tasks (classification and regression), and modalities (vision and language). Code is available at this repository: \href{https://github.com/thuml/LogME}{https://github.com/thuml/LogME}.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | Food-101 | Accuracy87.83 | 494 | |
| Image Classification | Stanford Cars | Accuracy91.8 | 477 | |
| Natural Language Understanding | GLUE | -- | 452 | |
| Image Classification | SUN397 | Accuracy66.2 | 425 | |
| Image Classification | Caltech-101 | Accuracy93.87 | 198 | |
| Image Classification | FGVC Aircraft | -- | 185 | |
| Image Classification | Oxford Flowers 102 | Accuracy97.56 | 172 | |
| Image Classification | Oxford-IIIT Pet | Accuracy94.7 | 161 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | Accuracy97.88 | 74 | |
| Model Selection | DTD | Weighted Kendall's Tau0.651 | 46 |