Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Graph Contrastive Learning Automated

About

Self-supervised learning on graph-structured data has drawn recent interest for learning generalizable, transferable and robust representations from unlabeled graphs. Among many, graph contrastive learning (GraphCL) has emerged with promising representation learning performance. Unfortunately, unlike its counterpart on image data, the effectiveness of GraphCL hinges on ad-hoc data augmentations, which have to be manually picked per dataset, by either rules of thumb or trial-and-errors, owing to the diverse nature of graph data. That significantly limits the more general applicability of GraphCL. Aiming to fill in this crucial gap, this paper proposes a unified bi-level optimization framework to automatically, adaptively and dynamically select data augmentations when performing GraphCL on specific graph data. The general framework, dubbed JOint Augmentation Optimization (JOAO), is instantiated as min-max optimization. The selections of augmentations made by JOAO are shown to be in general aligned with previous "best practices" observed from handcrafted tuning: yet now being automated, more flexible and versatile. Moreover, we propose a new augmentation-aware projection head mechanism, which will route output features through different projection heads corresponding to different augmentations chosen at each training step. Extensive experiments demonstrate that JOAO performs on par with or sometimes better than the state-of-the-art competitors including GraphCL, on multiple graph datasets of various scales and types, yet without resorting to any laborious dataset-specific tuning on augmentation selection. We release the code at https://github.com/Shen-Lab/GraphCL_Automated.

Yuning You, Tianlong Chen, Yang Shen, Zhangyang Wang• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Graph ClassificationPROTEINS
Accuracy74.6
742
Node ClassificationPubmed--
742
Graph ClassificationMUTAG
Accuracy87.6
697
Graph ClassificationNCI1
Accuracy78.3
460
Graph ClassificationCOLLAB
Accuracy69.5
329
Graph ClassificationIMDB-B
Accuracy70.8
322
Graph ClassificationNCI109
Accuracy69.2
223
Graph ClassificationIMDB-M
Accuracy49.2
218
Graph ClassificationMUTAG (10-fold cross-validation)
Accuracy88.33
206
Graph ClassificationDD
Accuracy77.4
175
Showing 10 of 117 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update