Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Self-Tuning for Data-Efficient Deep Learning

About

Deep learning has made revolutionary advances to diverse applications in the presence of large-scale labeled datasets. However, it is prohibitively time-costly and labor-expensive to collect sufficient labeled data in most realistic scenarios. To mitigate the requirement for labeled data, semi-supervised learning (SSL) focuses on simultaneously exploring both labeled and unlabeled data, while transfer learning (TL) popularizes a favorable practice of fine-tuning a pre-trained model to the target data. A dilemma is thus encountered: Without a decent pre-trained model to provide an implicit regularization, SSL through self-training from scratch will be easily misled by inaccurate pseudo-labels, especially in large-sized label space; Without exploring the intrinsic structure of unlabeled data, TL through fine-tuning from limited labeled data is at risk of under-transfer caused by model shift. To escape from this dilemma, we present Self-Tuning to enable data-efficient deep learning by unifying the exploration of labeled and unlabeled data and the transfer of a pre-trained model, as well as a Pseudo Group Contrast (PGC) mechanism to mitigate the reliance on pseudo-labels and boost the tolerance to false labels. Self-Tuning outperforms its SSL and TL counterparts on five tasks by sharp margins, e.g. it doubles the accuracy of fine-tuning on Cars with 15% labels.

Ximei Wang, Jinghan Gao, Mingsheng Long, Jianmin Wang• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Fine-grained Image ClassificationCUB200 2011 (test)
Accuracy81.6
536
Fine-grained Image ClassificationStanford Cars (test)
Accuracy92.33
348
Fine-grained visual classificationFGVC-Aircraft (test)
Top-1 Acc88.96
287
Image ClassificationCaltech-101
Top-1 Accuracy88.6
146
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 400 labels
Error Rate47.17
67
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 10000 labels (test)
Error Rate17.57
23
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 2500 labels (test)
Error Rate24.16
19
ClassificationStanford Cars 15% labels (test)
Accuracy74.99
8
ClassificationStanford Cars 30% labels (test)
Accuracy85.87
8
ClassificationStanford Cars 50% labels (test)
Accuracy0.8983
8
Showing 10 of 16 rows

Other info

Follow for update