ACE: Ally Complementary Experts for Solving Long-Tailed Recognition in One-Shot
About
One-stage long-tailed recognition methods improve the overall performance in a "seesaw" manner, i.e., either sacrifice the head's accuracy for better tail classification or elevate the head's accuracy even higher but ignore the tail. Existing algorithms bypass such trade-off by a multi-stage training process: pre-training on imbalanced set and fine-tuning on balanced set. Though achieving promising performance, not only are they sensitive to the generalizability of the pre-trained model, but also not easily integrated into other computer vision tasks like detection and segmentation, where pre-training of classifiers solely is not applicable. In this paper, we propose a one-stage long-tailed recognition scheme, ally complementary experts (ACE), where the expert is the most knowledgeable specialist in a sub-set that dominates its training, and is complementary to other experts in the less-seen categories without being disturbed by what it has never seen. We design a distribution-adaptive optimizer to adjust the learning pace of each expert to avoid over-fitting. Without special bells and whistles, the vanilla ACE outperforms the current one-stage SOTA method by 3-10% on CIFAR10-LT, CIFAR100-LT, ImageNet-LT and iNaturalist datasets. It is also shown to be the first one to break the "seesaw" trade-off by improving the accuracy of the majority and minority categories simultaneously in only one stage. Code and trained models are at https://github.com/jrcai/ACE.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-Tailed Image Classification | ImageNet-LT (test) | Top-1 Acc (Overall)56.6 | 220 | |
| Image Classification | iNaturalist 2018 (test) | Top-1 Accuracy72.9 | 192 | |
| Image Classification | ImageNet-LT (test) | Top-1 Acc (All)56.6 | 159 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100-LT IF 100 (test) | Top-1 Acc49.6 | 77 | |
| Long-tail Image Classification | iNaturalist 2018 (test) | -- | 59 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 Long Tailed Imbalance Ratio 50 (test) | Top-1 Accuracy84.9 | 57 | |
| Long-Tailed Image Classification | CIFAR-100-LT Imbalance Ratio 100 | Top-1 Acc49.6 | 47 | |
| Long-Tailed Image Classification | CIFAR10-LT imbalance factor 100 (test) | Top-1 Accuracy81.4 | 46 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100-LT Imbalance Factor 100 (test) | Top-1 Accuracy49.6 | 44 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-LT-100 Imbalance Factor 50 (test) | Top-1 Accuracy51.9 | 42 |