Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Amplitude-Phase Recombination: Rethinking Robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks in Frequency Domain

About

Recently, the generalization behavior of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) is gradually transparent through explanation techniques with the frequency components decomposition. However, the importance of the phase spectrum of the image for a robust vision system is still ignored. In this paper, we notice that the CNN tends to converge at the local optimum which is closely related to the high-frequency components of the training images, while the amplitude spectrum is easily disturbed such as noises or common corruptions. In contrast, more empirical studies found that humans rely on more phase components to achieve robust recognition. This observation leads to more explanations of the CNN's generalization behaviors in both robustness to common perturbations and out-of-distribution detection, and motivates a new perspective on data augmentation designed by re-combing the phase spectrum of the current image and the amplitude spectrum of the distracter image. That is, the generated samples force the CNN to pay more attention to the structured information from phase components and keep robust to the variation of the amplitude. Experiments on several image datasets indicate that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performances on multiple generalizations and calibration tasks, including adaptability for common corruptions and surface variations, out-of-distribution detection, and adversarial attack.

Guangyao Chen, Peixi Peng, Li Ma, Jia Li, Lin Du, Yonghong Tian• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 (test)
Accuracy96.1
3381
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100-C v1 (test)
Error Rate (Average)31
60
Out-of-Distribution DetectionCIFAR-10 (test)
AUROC0.947
45
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10-C 1 (test)
Classification Error9.1
40
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 standard (test)
Error Rate3.9
40
Image ClassificationImageNet-C
Gauss Error44
12
Image ClassificationImageNet
Test Error Rate24.4
12
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 (test)
Accuracy (Clean)85.3
5
Out-of-Distribution DetectionImageNet-O
AUROC62.3
2
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update