Is Pseudo-Lidar needed for Monocular 3D Object detection?
About
Recent progress in 3D object detection from single images leverages monocular depth estimation as a way to produce 3D pointclouds, turning cameras into pseudo-lidar sensors. These two-stage detectors improve with the accuracy of the intermediate depth estimation network, which can itself be improved without manual labels via large-scale self-supervised learning. However, they tend to suffer from overfitting more than end-to-end methods, are more complex, and the gap with similar lidar-based detectors remains significant. In this work, we propose an end-to-end, single stage, monocular 3D object detector, DD3D, that can benefit from depth pre-training like pseudo-lidar methods, but without their limitations. Our architecture is designed for effective information transfer between depth estimation and 3D detection, allowing us to scale with the amount of unlabeled pre-training data. Our method achieves state-of-the-art results on two challenging benchmarks, with 16.34% and 9.28% AP for Cars and Pedestrians (respectively) on the KITTI-3D benchmark, and 41.5% mAP on NuScenes.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D Object Detection | nuScenes (test) | mAP41.8 | 829 | |
| 3D Object Detection | NuScenes v1.0 (test) | mAP41.8 | 210 | |
| 3D Object Detection | KITTI car (test) | AP3D (Easy)23.22 | 195 | |
| 3D Object Detection | KITTI Pedestrian (test) | AP3D (Easy)1.39e+3 | 63 | |
| 3D Object Detection | KITTI (test) | -- | 60 | |
| Bird's eye view object detection | KITTI (test) | APBEV@0.7 (Easy)32.35 | 53 | |
| 3D Object Detection | KITTI Cyclist (test) | AP3D Easy239 | 49 | |
| 3D Object Detection | KITTI (test) | AP3D (Easy)23.22 | 26 | |
| Monocular 3D Object Detection | KITTI car (test) | AP3D R40 (Easy, IoU=0.7)23.22 | 19 | |
| Monocular 3D Object Detection | KITTI 3D (test) | AP3D Easy23.22 | 19 |