Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Compositional Generalization via Semantic Tagging

About

Although neural sequence-to-sequence models have been successfully applied to semantic parsing, they fail at compositional generalization, i.e., they are unable to systematically generalize to unseen compositions of seen components. Motivated by traditional semantic parsing where compositionality is explicitly accounted for by symbolic grammars, we propose a new decoding framework that preserves the expressivity and generality of sequence-to-sequence models while featuring lexicon-style alignments and disentangled information processing. Specifically, we decompose decoding into two phases where an input utterance is first tagged with semantic symbols representing the meaning of individual words, and then a sequence-to-sequence model is used to predict the final meaning representation conditioning on the utterance and the predicted tag sequence. Experimental results on three semantic parsing datasets show that the proposed approach consistently improves compositional generalization across model architectures, domains, and semantic formalisms.

Hao Zheng, Mirella Lapata• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Semantic ParsingCFQ (MCD2)
Accuracy8.2
33
Semantic ParsingCFQ (MCD1)
Accuracy34.9
33
Semantic ParsingCFQ MCD3
Accuracy10.6
33
Semantic ParsingCOGS (generalization)
Accuracy (Generalization)88
25
Semantic ParsingCFQ MCD avg
Exact Match Accuracy17.8
22
Text-to-SQLGeoquery
Exact Match Accuracy63.6
17
Semantic ParsingCFQ MCD2 (test)
Accuracy0.082
15
Semantic ParsingCFQ MCD1 (test)
Accuracy34.9
15
Semantic ParsingCFQ MCD3 (test)
Accuracy10.6
15
Text-to-SQLATIS
Exact Match Accuracy29.1
13
Showing 10 of 12 rows

Other info

Follow for update