Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulation

About

Imitating human demonstrations is a promising approach to endow robots with various manipulation capabilities. While recent advances have been made in imitation learning and batch (offline) reinforcement learning, a lack of open-source human datasets and reproducible learning methods make assessing the state of the field difficult. In this paper, we conduct an extensive study of six offline learning algorithms for robot manipulation on five simulated and three real-world multi-stage manipulation tasks of varying complexity, and with datasets of varying quality. Our study analyzes the most critical challenges when learning from offline human data for manipulation. Based on the study, we derive a series of lessons including the sensitivity to different algorithmic design choices, the dependence on the quality of the demonstrations, and the variability based on the stopping criteria due to the different objectives in training and evaluation. We also highlight opportunities for learning from human datasets, such as the ability to learn proficient policies on challenging, multi-stage tasks beyond the scope of current reinforcement learning methods, and the ability to easily scale to natural, real-world manipulation scenarios where only raw sensory signals are available. We have open-sourced our datasets and all algorithm implementations to facilitate future research and fair comparisons in learning from human demonstration data. Codebase, datasets, trained models, and more available at https://arise-initiative.github.io/robomimic-web/

Ajay Mandlekar, Danfei Xu, Josiah Wong, Soroush Nasiriany, Chen Wang, Rohun Kulkarni, Li Fei-Fei, Silvio Savarese, Yuke Zhu, Roberto Mart\'in-Mart\'in• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Robot ManipulationMimicGen 3-Part Assembly D2
Success Rate11.3
72
Robotic ManipulationRobomimic Can
Success Rate90
57
Robotic ManipulationRobomimic Square
Success Rate51
54
Robot ManipulationMimicGen Square D2
Success Rate45.3
51
Robotic ManipulationRobomimic Lift
Success Rate95
47
Robot ManipulationMimicGen Stack Three D1
Success Rate51.3
46
Stacking Three BlocksRobomimic MimicGen Stack Three (D1)
Success Rate0.513
46
SquareMimicGen D2
Success Rate45.3
36
Robotic ManipulationManiSkill3
Average Success Rate9
33
Robotic ManipulationAdroit and MetaWorld
Average Success Rate8.8
28
Showing 10 of 78 rows
...

Other info

Code

Follow for update