Git: Clustering Based on Graph of Intensity Topology
About
\textbf{A}ccuracy, \textbf{R}obustness to noises and scales, \textbf{I}nterpretability, \textbf{S}peed, and \textbf{E}asy to use (ARISE) are crucial requirements of a good clustering algorithm. However, achieving these goals simultaneously is challenging, and most advanced approaches only focus on parts of them. Towards an overall consideration of these aspects, we propose a novel clustering algorithm, namely GIT (Clustering Based on \textbf{G}raph of \textbf{I}ntensity \textbf{T}opology). GIT considers both local and global data structures: firstly forming local clusters based on intensity peaks of samples, and then estimating the global topological graph (topo-graph) between these local clusters. We use the Wasserstein Distance between the predicted and prior class proportions to automatically cut noisy edges in the topo-graph and merge connected local clusters as final clusters. Then, we compare GIT with seven competing algorithms on five synthetic datasets and nine real-world datasets. With fast local cluster detection, robust topo-graph construction and accurate edge-cutting, GIT shows attractive ARISE performance and significantly exceeds other non-convex clustering methods. For example, GIT outperforms its counterparts about $10\%$ (F1-score) on MNIST and FashionMNIST. Code is available at \color{red}{https://github.com/gaozhangyang/GIT}.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clustering | Wine | ARI0.71 | 53 | |
| Clustering | FMNIST | ARI32 | 43 | |
| Clustering | Cancer | ARI73 | 25 | |
| Clustering | Face | NMI0.78 | 20 | |
| Clustering | MNIST | NMI53 | 15 | |
| Clustering | Hepatitis | F1 Score0.78 | 6 | |
| Clustering | Codon | F1 Score45 | 6 | |
| Clustering | Frogs | F1 Score66 | 6 |