Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Improving Conditional Coverage via Orthogonal Quantile Regression

About

We develop a method to generate prediction intervals that have a user-specified coverage level across all regions of feature-space, a property called conditional coverage. A typical approach to this task is to estimate the conditional quantiles with quantile regression -- it is well-known that this leads to correct coverage in the large-sample limit, although it may not be accurate in finite samples. We find in experiments that traditional quantile regression can have poor conditional coverage. To remedy this, we modify the loss function to promote independence between the size of the intervals and the indicator of a miscoverage event. For the true conditional quantiles, these two quantities are independent (orthogonal), so the modified loss function continues to be valid. Moreover, we empirically show that the modified loss function leads to improved conditional coverage, as evaluated by several metrics. We also introduce two new metrics that check conditional coverage by looking at the strength of the dependence between the interval size and the indicator of miscoverage.

Shai Feldman, Stephen Bates, Yaniv Romano• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
RegressionBoston UCI (test)--
26
RegressionConcrete UCI (test pool)
MACE0.048
14
Conditional coverage diagnosisSynthetic samples Conditional
Diagnostic Score0.019
10
Conditional coverage diagnosisSynthetic samples Not conditional
Diagnostic Score0.00e+0
10
Uncertainty CalibrationMEPS Panel 19 2017 (test)
Length252
6
Uncertainty CalibrationMEPS Panel 21 2017 (test)
Length293
6
Uncertainty CalibrationMEPS Panel 20 2017 (test)
Length274
6
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update