Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Adaptive Universal Generalized PageRank Graph Neural Network

About

In many important graph data processing applications the acquired information includes both node features and observations of the graph topology. Graph neural networks (GNNs) are designed to exploit both sources of evidence but they do not optimally trade-off their utility and integrate them in a manner that is also universal. Here, universality refers to independence on homophily or heterophily graph assumptions. We address these issues by introducing a new Generalized PageRank (GPR) GNN architecture that adaptively learns the GPR weights so as to jointly optimize node feature and topological information extraction, regardless of the extent to which the node labels are homophilic or heterophilic. Learned GPR weights automatically adjust to the node label pattern, irrelevant on the type of initialization, and thereby guarantee excellent learning performance for label patterns that are usually hard to handle. Furthermore, they allow one to avoid feature over-smoothing, a process which renders feature information nondiscriminative, without requiring the network to be shallow. Our accompanying theoretical analysis of the GPR-GNN method is facilitated by novel synthetic benchmark datasets generated by the so-called contextual stochastic block model. We also compare the performance of our GNN architecture with that of several state-of-the-art GNNs on the problem of node-classification, using well-known benchmark homophilic and heterophilic datasets. The results demonstrate that GPR-GNN offers significant performance improvement compared to existing techniques on both synthetic and benchmark data.

Eli Chien, Jianhao Peng, Pan Li, Olgica Milenkovic• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationCora
Accuracy88.37
885
Node ClassificationCiteseer
Accuracy80.13
804
Node ClassificationPubmed
Accuracy90.15
742
Node ClassificationCiteseer (test)
Accuracy0.7733
729
Node ClassificationCora (test)
Mean Accuracy88.97
687
Node ClassificationChameleon
Accuracy70.6
549
Node ClassificationPubMed (test)
Accuracy90.15
500
Node ClassificationSquirrel
Accuracy54.35
500
Node ClassificationCornell
Accuracy80.27
426
Node ClassificationTexas
Accuracy78.38
410
Showing 10 of 249 rows
...

Other info

Code

Follow for update