Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minima

About

Domain generalization (DG) methods aim to achieve generalizability to an unseen target domain by using only training data from the source domains. Although a variety of DG methods have been proposed, a recent study shows that under a fair evaluation protocol, called DomainBed, the simple empirical risk minimization (ERM) approach works comparable to or even outperforms previous methods. Unfortunately, simply solving ERM on a complex, non-convex loss function can easily lead to sub-optimal generalizability by seeking sharp minima. In this paper, we theoretically show that finding flat minima results in a smaller domain generalization gap. We also propose a simple yet effective method, named Stochastic Weight Averaging Densely (SWAD), to find flat minima. SWAD finds flatter minima and suffers less from overfitting than does the vanilla SWA by a dense and overfit-aware stochastic weight sampling strategy. SWAD shows state-of-the-art performances on five DG benchmarks, namely PACS, VLCS, OfficeHome, TerraIncognita, and DomainNet, with consistent and large margins of +1.6% averagely on out-of-domain accuracy. We also compare SWAD with conventional generalization methods, such as data augmentation and consistency regularization methods, to verify that the remarkable performance improvements are originated from by seeking flat minima, not from better in-domain generalizability. Last but not least, SWAD is readily adaptable to existing DG methods without modification; the combination of SWAD and an existing DG method further improves DG performances. Source code is available at https://github.com/khanrc/swad.

Junbum Cha, Sanghyuk Chun, Kyungjae Lee, Han-Cheol Cho, Seunghyun Park, Yunsung Lee, Sungrae Park• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationImageNet-R
Top-1 Acc38.8
474
Image ClassificationImageNet--
429
Domain GeneralizationVLCS
Accuracy79.1
238
Domain GeneralizationPACS (test)
Average Accuracy88.1
225
Domain GeneralizationPACS
Accuracy (Art)89.3
221
Image ClassificationDomainNet (test)
Average Accuracy36.73
209
Domain GeneralizationOfficeHome
Accuracy71.3
182
Image ClassificationOfficeHome
Average Accuracy70.6
131
Domain GeneralizationDomainBed
Average Accuracy66.9
127
Domain GeneralizationDomainNet
Accuracy46.8
113
Showing 10 of 66 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update