Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Subpixel Heatmap Regression for Facial Landmark Localization

About

Deep Learning models based on heatmap regression have revolutionized the task of facial landmark localization with existing models working robustly under large poses, non-uniform illumination and shadows, occlusions and self-occlusions, low resolution and blur. However, despite their wide adoption, heatmap regression approaches suffer from discretization-induced errors related to both the heatmap encoding and decoding process. In this work we show that these errors have a surprisingly large negative impact on facial alignment accuracy. To alleviate this problem, we propose a new approach for the heatmap encoding and decoding process by leveraging the underlying continuous distribution. To take full advantage of the newly proposed encoding-decoding mechanism, we also introduce a Siamese-based training that enforces heatmap consistency across various geometric image transformations. Our approach offers noticeable gains across multiple datasets setting a new state-of-the-art result in facial landmark localization. Code alongside the pretrained models will be made available at https://www.adrianbulat.com/face-alignment

Adrian Bulat, Enrique Sanchez, Georgios Tzimiropoulos• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Facial Landmark Detection300-W (Common)--
180
Facial Landmark Detection300-W (Fullset)
Mean Error (%)2.94
174
Facial Landmark Detection300W (Challenging)--
159
Facial Landmark DetectionWFLW (test)
Mean Error (ME) - All3.72
122
Facial Landmark DetectionCOFW (test)
NME3.02
93
Facial Landmark DetectionWFLW (Full)
NME (%)3.72
65
Landmark DetectionCOFW-68 (test)
Mean Error (%)2.47
31
Facial Landmark DetectionAFLW Full
NME (diag)1.31
19
Facial Landmark DetectionAFLW Frontal
NME (diag)1.12
15
Facial Landmark Localization300W Common (Split II)
NME (Inter-ocular)2.61
14
Showing 10 of 20 rows

Other info

Follow for update