Mixture Proportion Estimation and PU Learning: A Modern Approach
About
Given only positive examples and unlabeled examples (from both positive and negative classes), we might hope nevertheless to estimate an accurate positive-versus-negative classifier. Formally, this task is broken down into two subtasks: (i) Mixture Proportion Estimation (MPE) -- determining the fraction of positive examples in the unlabeled data; and (ii) PU-learning -- given such an estimate, learning the desired positive-versus-negative classifier. Unfortunately, classical methods for both problems break down in high-dimensional settings. Meanwhile, recently proposed heuristics lack theoretical coherence and depend precariously on hyperparameter tuning. In this paper, we propose two simple techniques: Best Bin Estimation (BBE) (for MPE); and Conditional Value Ignoring Risk (CVIR), a simple objective for PU-learning. Both methods dominate previous approaches empirically, and for BBE, we establish formal guarantees that hold whenever we can train a model to cleanly separate out a small subset of positive examples. Our final algorithm (TED)$^n$, alternates between the two procedures, significantly improving both our mixture proportion estimator and classifier
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Image Segmentation | BTCV (test) | -- | 28 | |
| Cardiac Segmentation | ACDC | Dice (LV)86.6 | 22 | |
| PvN classification | Binarized CIFAR | Accuracy82.7 | 18 | |
| Mixture Proportion Estimation | Binarized CIFAR | Absolute Estimation Error0.026 | 17 | |
| Binary Classification | CIFAR-100 | Accuracy84.25 | 16 | |
| Binary Classification | CIFAR-10 | Accuracy91.19 | 16 | |
| Binary Classification | STL-10 | Accuracy76.9 | 16 | |
| Irregular structure segmentation | Decathlon BrainTumor | Dice (Tumor)72 | 13 | |
| Regular cardiac structure segmentation | MSCMRseg LGE CMR | Dice (LV)33.1 | 13 | |
| Mixture Proportion Estimation | CIFAR Dog vs Cat | Abs. Estimation Error0.066 | 12 |