Facial Landmark Points Detection Using Knowledge Distillation-Based Neural Networks
About
Facial landmark detection is a vital step for numerous facial image analysis applications. Although some deep learning-based methods have achieved good performances in this task, they are often not suitable for running on mobile devices. Such methods rely on networks with many parameters, which makes the training and inference time-consuming. Training lightweight neural networks such as MobileNets are often challenging, and the models might have low accuracy. Inspired by knowledge distillation (KD), this paper presents a novel loss function to train a lightweight Student network (e.g., MobileNetV2) for facial landmark detection. We use two Teacher networks, a Tolerant-Teacher and a Tough-Teacher in conjunction with the Student network. The Tolerant-Teacher is trained using Soft-landmarks created by active shape models, while the Tough-Teacher is trained using the ground truth (aka Hard-landmarks) landmark points. To utilize the facial landmark points predicted by the Teacher networks, we define an Assistive Loss (ALoss) for each Teacher network. Moreover, we define a loss function called KD-Loss that utilizes the facial landmark points predicted by the two pre-trained Teacher networks (EfficientNet-b3) to guide the lightweight Student network towards predicting the Hard-landmarks. Our experimental results on three challenging facial datasets show that the proposed architecture will result in a better-trained Student network that can extract facial landmark points with high accuracy.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facial Landmark Detection | 300W (Challenging) | NME6.13 | 159 | |
| Facial Landmark Detection | WFLW (test) | Mean Error (ME) - All8.57 | 122 | |
| Facial Landmark Detection | COFW (test) | NME4.11 | 93 | |
| Facial Landmark Detection | WFLW Pose | Mean Error (%)15.06 | 50 | |
| Facial Landmark Detection | WFLW Blur | Mean Error (%)9.4 | 49 | |
| Facial Landmark Detection | WFLW Make-up | Mean Error8.75 | 49 | |
| Facial Landmark Localization | 300-W (Full set) | NME4.06 | 46 | |
| Facial Landmark Detection | WFLW Expression | Failure Rate @0.127.38 | 45 | |
| Facial Landmark Detection | WFLW Illumination | Failure Rate @0.119.91 | 45 | |
| Landmark Localization | 300W (Chall.) | Mean Error (%)6.13 | 44 |