SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarization
About
In the summarization domain, a key requirement for summaries is to be factually consistent with the input document. Previous work has found that natural language inference (NLI) models do not perform competitively when applied to inconsistency detection. In this work, we revisit the use of NLI for inconsistency detection, finding that past work suffered from a mismatch in input granularity between NLI datasets (sentence-level), and inconsistency detection (document level). We provide a highly effective and light-weight method called SummaCConv that enables NLI models to be successfully used for this task by segmenting documents into sentence units and aggregating scores between pairs of sentences. On our newly introduced benchmark called SummaC (Summary Consistency) consisting of six large inconsistency detection datasets, SummaCConv obtains state-of-the-art results with a balanced accuracy of 74.4%, a 5% point improvement compared to prior work. We make the models and datasets available: https://github.com/tingofurro/summac
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | SummaC | CGS73.6 | 52 | |
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | QAGS XSUM | Spearman Correlation45 | 39 | |
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | QAGS CNNDM | Spearman Correlation58.4 | 38 | |
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | TRUE benchmark | PAWS (AUC-ROC)89 | 37 | |
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | SummEval | Spearman Correlation41.4 | 36 | |
| Opinion Summarization Metric Evaluation | OPINSUMMEVAL | Aspect Relevance30 | 32 | |
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | FRANK CNNDM | Spearman Correlation52.4 | 30 | |
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | SamSum | Spearman Correlation16.7 | 30 | |
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | FRANK-XSum (FRK-X) | Spearman Correlation12.8 | 30 | |
| Factual Consistency Evaluation | FRANK CNNDM (test) | PCC58.7 | 22 |