Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Learning to Align Sequential Actions in the Wild

About

State-of-the-art methods for self-supervised sequential action alignment rely on deep networks that find correspondences across videos in time. They either learn frame-to-frame mapping across sequences, which does not leverage temporal information, or assume monotonic alignment between each video pair, which ignores variations in the order of actions. As such, these methods are not able to deal with common real-world scenarios that involve background frames or videos that contain non-monotonic sequence of actions. In this paper, we propose an approach to align sequential actions in the wild that involve diverse temporal variations. To this end, we propose an approach to enforce temporal priors on the optimal transport matrix, which leverages temporal consistency, while allowing for variations in the order of actions. Our model accounts for both monotonic and non-monotonic sequences and handles background frames that should not be aligned. We demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art in self-supervised sequential action representation learning on four different benchmark datasets.

Weizhe Liu, Bugra Tekin, Huseyin Coskun, Vibhav Vineet, Pascal Fua, Marc Pollefeys• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Action phase classificationPenn-Action
Phase Classification Accuracy84.48
48
Video AlignmentPenn-Action
Kendall's Tau0.8053
33
Action phase classificationCOIN
Phase Acc47.26
32
Action SegmentationCOIN
Frame Accuracy47.3
29
Action phase classificationIKEA ASM No Background
Phase Classification Accuracy33.79
24
Action phase classificationIKEA ASM (Background)
Accuracy (Phase Classification)29.95
24
Action phase classificationPouring
Phase Classification Accuracy92.45
24
Temporal AlignmentPouring
Phase Progression0.8361
5
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Follow for update