Empirical Study of Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning
About
We offer an experimental benchmark and empirical study for off-policy policy evaluation (OPE) in reinforcement learning, which is a key problem in many safety critical applications. Given the increasing interest in deploying learning-based methods, there has been a flurry of recent proposals for OPE method, leading to a need for standardized empirical analyses. Our work takes a strong focus on diversity of experimental design to enable stress testing of OPE methods. We provide a comprehensive benchmarking suite to study the interplay of different attributes on method performance. We distill the results into a summarized set of guidelines for OPE in practice. Our software package, the Caltech OPE Benchmarking Suite (COBS), is open-sourced and we invite interested researchers to further contribute to the benchmark.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Off-policy Evaluation | HotpotQA (cross) | Correlation Coefficient (rho)0.45 | 6 | |
| Off-policy Evaluation | ALFWorld (iter1) | Rho0.00e+0 | 6 | |
| Off-policy Evaluation | ALFWorld (iter3) | Rho0.00e+0 | 6 | |
| Off-policy Evaluation | HotpotQA (DPO) | Rho0.00e+0 | 6 | |
| Off-policy Evaluation | ScienceWorld (ETO) | Rho0.00e+0 | 6 | |
| Off-policy Evaluation | WebShop (iter1) | rho0.00e+0 | 6 |