Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

FjORD: Fair and Accurate Federated Learning under heterogeneous targets with Ordered Dropout

About

Federated Learning (FL) has been gaining significant traction across different ML tasks, ranging from vision to keyboard predictions. In large-scale deployments, client heterogeneity is a fact and constitutes a primary problem for fairness, training performance and accuracy. Although significant efforts have been made into tackling statistical data heterogeneity, the diversity in the processing capabilities and network bandwidth of clients, termed as system heterogeneity, has remained largely unexplored. Current solutions either disregard a large portion of available devices or set a uniform limit on the model's capacity, restricted by the least capable participants. In this work, we introduce Ordered Dropout, a mechanism that achieves an ordered, nested representation of knowledge in deep neural networks (DNNs) and enables the extraction of lower footprint submodels without the need of retraining. We further show that for linear maps our Ordered Dropout is equivalent to SVD. We employ this technique, along with a self-distillation methodology, in the realm of FL in a framework called FjORD. FjORD alleviates the problem of client system heterogeneity by tailoring the model width to the client's capabilities. Extensive evaluation on both CNNs and RNNs across diverse modalities shows that FjORD consistently leads to significant performance gains over state-of-the-art baselines, while maintaining its nested structure.

Samuel Horvath, Stefanos Laskaridis, Mario Almeida, Ilias Leontiadis, Stylianos I. Venieris, Nicholas D. Lane• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)
Accuracy11.14
3518
Image ClassificationTinyImageNet (test)
Accuracy27.5
366
Image ClassificationCIFAR10 non-iid
Accuracy46.3
157
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 non-IID (test)
Test Accuracy (Avg Best)14.68
62
Image ClassificationCINIC-10 iid (test)
Test Accuracy22.22
26
Image ClassificationCINIC-10 non-iid
Accuracy20.08
26
Language ModelingShakespeare
Accuracy (Mean)42.9
25
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 iid (test)
Accuracy27.8
22
Image ClassificationFEMNIST
Accuracy80.6
18
Image ClassificationCIFAR10
Accuracy (Mean)57.7
15
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Follow for update