Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Evolution Gym: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Evolving Soft Robots

About

Both the design and control of a robot play equally important roles in its task performance. However, while optimal control is well studied in the machine learning and robotics community, less attention is placed on finding the optimal robot design. This is mainly because co-optimizing design and control in robotics is characterized as a challenging problem, and more importantly, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark for co-optimization does not exist. In this paper, we propose Evolution Gym, the first large-scale benchmark for co-optimizing the design and control of soft robots. In our benchmark, each robot is composed of different types of voxels (e.g., soft, rigid, actuators), resulting in a modular and expressive robot design space. Our benchmark environments span a wide range of tasks, including locomotion on various types of terrains and manipulation. Furthermore, we develop several robot co-evolution algorithms by combining state-of-the-art design optimization methods and deep reinforcement learning techniques. Evaluating the algorithms on our benchmark platform, we observe robots exhibiting increasingly complex behaviors as evolution progresses, with the best evolved designs solving many of our proposed tasks. Additionally, even though robot designs are evolved autonomously from scratch without prior knowledge, they often grow to resemble existing natural creatures while outperforming hand-designed robots. Nevertheless, all tested algorithms fail to find robots that succeed in our hardest environments. This suggests that more advanced algorithms are required to explore the high-dimensional design space and evolve increasingly intelligent robots -- an area of research in which we hope Evolution Gym will accelerate progress. Our website with code, environments, documentation, and tutorials is available at http://evogym.csail.mit.edu.

Jagdeep Singh Bhatia, Holly Jackson, Yunsheng Tian, Jie Xu, Wojciech Matusik• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
BalancerEVOGYM 10x10 Balancer 1.0
Fitness0.09
5
BridgeWalkerEVOGYM 10x10 BridgeWalker 1.0
Fitness2.46
5
ClimberEVOGYM 10x10 Climber 1.0
Fitness0.63
5
PusherEVOGYM 10x10 Pusher 1.0
Fitness8.47
5
CarrierEVOGYM 10x10 Carrier 1.0
Fitness3.41
5
JumperEVOGYM 10x10 Jumper 1.0
Fitness5.94
5
WalkerEVOGYM 10x10 Walker 1.0
Fitness9.31
5
ClimberEVOGYM 5x5
Maximal Fitness0.57
2
BalancerEVOGYM 5x5
Maximal Fitness0.13
2
BridgeWalkerEVOGYM 5x5
Maximal Fitness3.65
2
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update