Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Designing the Topology of Graph Neural Networks: A Novel Feature Fusion Perspective

About

In recent years, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown superior performance on diverse real-world applications. To improve the model capacity, besides designing aggregation operations, GNN topology design is also very important. In general, there are two mainstream GNN topology design manners. The first one is to stack aggregation operations to obtain the higher-level features but easily got performance drop as the network goes deeper. Secondly, the multiple aggregation operations are utilized in each layer which provides adequate and independent feature extraction stage on local neighbors while are costly to obtain the higher-level information. To enjoy the benefits while alleviating the corresponding deficiencies of these two manners, we learn to design the topology of GNNs in a novel feature fusion perspective which is dubbed F$^2$GNN. To be specific, we provide a feature fusion perspective in designing GNN topology and propose a novel framework to unify the existing topology designs with feature selection and fusion strategies. Then we develop a neural architecture search method on top of the unified framework which contains a set of selection and fusion operations in the search space and an improved differentiable search algorithm. The performance gains on eight real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of F$^2$GNN. We further conduct experiments to show that F$^2$GNN can improve the model capacity while alleviating the deficiencies of existing GNN topology design manners, especially alleviating the over-smoothing problem, by utilizing different levels of features adaptively.

Lanning Wei, Huan Zhao, Zhiqiang He• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationSquirrel (test)
Mean Accuracy47.32
234
Node ClassificationChameleon (test)
Mean Accuracy67.81
230
Node ClassificationTexas (test)
Mean Accuracy82.7
228
Node ClassificationWisconsin (test)
Mean Accuracy87.06
198
Node ClassificationCornell (test)
Mean Accuracy83.51
188
Node ClassificationChameleon h=0.23 (test)
Mean Accuracy63.31
56
Node ClassificationFilm (test)
Accuracy36.65
41
Node ClassificationTexas homophily: 0.11 (test)
Accuracy83.78
15
Node ClassificationSquirrel homophily: 0.22 (test)
Accuracy41.81
15
Node ClassificationActor homophily: 0.22 (test)
Accuracy37.01
14
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update