Formal Mathematics Statement Curriculum Learning
About
We explore the use of expert iteration in the context of language modeling applied to formal mathematics. We show that at same compute budget, expert iteration, by which we mean proof search interleaved with learning, dramatically outperforms proof search only. We also observe that when applied to a collection of formal statements of sufficiently varied difficulty, expert iteration is capable of finding and solving a curriculum of increasingly difficult problems, without the need for associated ground-truth proofs. Finally, by applying this expert iteration to a manually curated set of problem statements, we achieve state-of-the-art on the miniF2F benchmark, automatically solving multiple challenging problems drawn from high school olympiads.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formal Theorem Proving | MiniF2F (test) | Pass@129.6 | 100 | |
| Automated Theorem Proving | MiniF2F (test) | Success Rate29.6 | 93 | |
| Theorem Proving | miniF2F (val) | Success Rate33.6 | 59 | |
| Theorem Proving | miniF2F Lean (test) | Pass@6436.6 | 24 | |
| Formal Theorem Proving | miniF2F (val) | Pass@133.6 | 15 | |
| Theorem Proving | miniF2F Lean (val) | Cumulative Pass Rate58.6 | 10 | |
| Formal Theorem Proving | mathlib (val) | Pass@162.6 | 9 | |
| Formal Theorem Proving | mathlib (test) | Pass@163 | 3 |