Revisiting RCAN: Improved Training for Image Super-Resolution
About
Image super-resolution (SR) is a fast-moving field with novel architectures attracting the spotlight. However, most SR models were optimized with dated training strategies. In this work, we revisit the popular RCAN model and examine the effect of different training options in SR. Surprisingly (or perhaps as expected), we show that RCAN can outperform or match nearly all the CNN-based SR architectures published after RCAN on standard benchmarks with a proper training strategy and minimal architecture change. Besides, although RCAN is a very large SR architecture with more than four hundred convolutional layers, we draw a notable conclusion that underfitting is still the main problem restricting the model capability instead of overfitting. We observe supportive evidence that increasing training iterations clearly improves the model performance while applying regularization techniques generally degrades the predictions. We denote our simply revised RCAN as RCAN-it and recommend practitioners to use it as baselines for future research. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/zudi-lin/rcan-it.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Super-resolution | Set5 | PSNR38.37 | 507 | |
| Super-Resolution | Set14 4x (test) | PSNR28.99 | 117 | |
| Image Super-resolution | Urban100 x4 (test) | PSNR27.16 | 90 | |
| Image Super-resolution | Urban100 x2 (test) | PSNR33.62 | 72 | |
| Image Super-resolution | Urban100 x3 (test) | PSNR29.38 | 58 | |
| Super-Resolution | BSD100 4x (test) | PSNR27.87 | 56 | |
| Image Super-resolution | Manga109 x2 (test) | PSNR39.88 | 52 | |
| Super-Resolution | Manga109 x3 (test) | PSNR34.92 | 49 | |
| Image Super-resolution | Manga109 x4 (test) | PSNR31.78 | 44 | |
| Super-Resolution | Set14 x3 (test) | PSNR30.76 | 43 |