Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

MetaFormer: A Unified Meta Framework for Fine-Grained Recognition

About

Fine-Grained Visual Classification(FGVC) is the task that requires recognizing the objects belonging to multiple subordinate categories of a super-category. Recent state-of-the-art methods usually design sophisticated learning pipelines to tackle this task. However, visual information alone is often not sufficient to accurately differentiate between fine-grained visual categories. Nowadays, the meta-information (e.g., spatio-temporal prior, attribute, and text description) usually appears along with the images. This inspires us to ask the question: Is it possible to use a unified and simple framework to utilize various meta-information to assist in fine-grained identification? To answer this problem, we explore a unified and strong meta-framework(MetaFormer) for fine-grained visual classification. In practice, MetaFormer provides a simple yet effective approach to address the joint learning of vision and various meta-information. Moreover, MetaFormer also provides a strong baseline for FGVC without bells and whistles. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MetaFormer can effectively use various meta-information to improve the performance of fine-grained recognition. In a fair comparison, MetaFormer can outperform the current SotA approaches with only vision information on the iNaturalist2017 and iNaturalist2018 datasets. Adding meta-information, MetaFormer can exceed the current SotA approaches by 5.9% and 5.3%, respectively. Moreover, MetaFormer can achieve 92.3% and 92.7% on CUB-200-2011 and NABirds, which significantly outperforms the SotA approaches. The source code and pre-trained models are released athttps://github.com/dqshuai/MetaFormer.

Qishuai Diao, Yi Jiang, Bin Wen, Jia Sun, Zehuan Yuan• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationImageNet-1k (val)
Top-1 Acc84.6
706
Fine-grained Image ClassificationCUB200 2011 (test)
Accuracy92.4
536
Image ClassificationStanford Cars
Accuracy95
477
Image ClassificationAircraft
Accuracy94.3
302
Image ClassificationiNaturalist 2018
Top-1 Accuracy88.7
287
Fine-grained Image ClassificationCUB-200 2011
Accuracy91.9
222
Fine-grained visual classificationNABirds (test)
Top-1 Accuracy92.7
157
Fine-grained Image ClassificationiNaturalist 2017 (test)
Accuracy83.4
19
Fine-grained Image ClassificationiNaturalist 2017
Accuracy82
17
Fine-grained pathology recognitionPediatric wrist pathologies (test)
Accuracy79.1
14
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update