Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Adaptive Fourier Neural Operators: Efficient Token Mixers for Transformers

About

Vision transformers have delivered tremendous success in representation learning. This is primarily due to effective token mixing through self attention. However, this scales quadratically with the number of pixels, which becomes infeasible for high-resolution inputs. To cope with this challenge, we propose Adaptive Fourier Neural Operator (AFNO) as an efficient token mixer that learns to mix in the Fourier domain. AFNO is based on a principled foundation of operator learning which allows us to frame token mixing as a continuous global convolution without any dependence on the input resolution. This principle was previously used to design FNO, which solves global convolution efficiently in the Fourier domain and has shown promise in learning challenging PDEs. To handle challenges in visual representation learning such as discontinuities in images and high resolution inputs, we propose principled architectural modifications to FNO which results in memory and computational efficiency. This includes imposing a block-diagonal structure on the channel mixing weights, adaptively sharing weights across tokens, and sparsifying the frequency modes via soft-thresholding and shrinkage. The resulting model is highly parallel with a quasi-linear complexity and has linear memory in the sequence size. AFNO outperforms self-attention mechanisms for few-shot segmentation in terms of both efficiency and accuracy. For Cityscapes segmentation with the Segformer-B3 backbone, AFNO can handle a sequence size of 65k and outperforms other efficient self-attention mechanisms.

John Guibas, Morteza Mardani, Zongyi Li, Andrew Tao, Anima Anandkumar, Bryan Catanzaro• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Operator Learning (Forward PDE Solver)Radial Kernel Problem OOD1 (test)
Operator Test Error68.76
16
Operator Learning (Forward PDE Solver)Radial Kernel Problem ID (test)
Operator Test Error (%)22.62
16
PDE Surrogate ModelingTurbulent Radiative Layer 2D (test)
VRMSE0.486
5
PDE Surrogate ModelingShear Flow (test)
VRMSE0.689
5
PDE Surrogate ModelingActive Matter (test)
VRMSE0.99
5
Temporal forecasting2D Shallow Water equations
RMSE9.5
4
Steady-state Darcy Flow prediction2D Darcy Flow
RMSE1.545
3
Showing 7 of 7 rows

Other info

Follow for update